There are two completely different questions hiding in "is this valid?"
The first is syntactic validity: does this text follow the JSON grammar? Are the braces balanced, the strings double-quoted, the commas in legal positions? That is what this tool answers, and it is a closed question with a definite yes or no. RFC 8259 defines the grammar in about two pages, which is why JSON parsers are small and why every language agrees on what is well-formed.
The second is semantic validity: is this the right JSON? Does it have the fields your API requires, are the types correct, is `age` a non-negative integer, is `email` actually an email address? Syntax checking cannot answer any of that. `{"a": 1}` is perfectly valid JSON and completely wrong as a user record.
Confusing the two is the most common reason people are surprised when a document passes validation and then breaks downstream. If you need the second kind of answer, you need a schema - which is what the JSON Schema Validator is for.